Apr27
I am a man of willpower, sure, but there are some things that I just cannot avoid. One of the delicacies I thoroughly enjoy is scrapple. Sure, some of you health nuts are cringing and looking the other way — I get that, but if you put aside its components and react strictly on taste, I assure you scrapple is unparalleled.
As you learn throughout the course of academic study, one of the essential elements of a well-constructed argument is to acknowledge the opposition’s viewpoint in hopes of strengthening your own. With that said, here goes: Scrapple is virtually the scraps of the other meats in the family.
Now that we’re past that, let’s get turn our attention to the (5) reasons scrapple is awesome, shall we?
Reason 1: Scrapple is always there for you.
- Possibly the best characteristic about breakfast is its ability to be enjoyed any time of the day. Well, scrapple — a predominately breakfast-driven delight — follows the breakfast trend of being able to be enjoyed at any moment of the day. Having a rough morning? Have a scrapple sandwich. Tough day at work? Enjoy some scrapple and eggs for a lunchtime treat. Need to blow some steam after a tough commute home? Cut a couple slices of scrapple off the block and get grubbing!
Reason 2: Scrapple is the perfect change-up.
- At most breakfast chains, you’re given the choice of ham, bacon, or sausage. Don’t misunderstand me, there is nothing wrong with any one of these choices, but one can get burned out eating the same old breakfast meats. Scrapple fills that breakfast void in terms of variety.
Reason 3: Scrapple is a regional juggernaut.
- Most people in the Northeast and out West ain’t got a clue about this stuff because us Philly folk know how to keep a good thing local. Think about it: Go to the South and order a “Steak and Cheese,” I assure you it ain’t what you had in mind — it just isn’t the same. In the Mid-Atlantic, however, scrapple known and respected, and often mistreated, too, by the haters of society.
Reason 4: Harry Kalas ate scrapple.
- C’mon, Phillies fans — I shouldn’t have to type another damn word.
Reason 5: Scrapple is superior to “Ice” beer.
- If you want to talk logistics, then, sure, let’s do it! You beer drinkers of the world — this is directed to you. I am willing to say that in high school or college you drank Natural Ice. First off, that stuff is a hangover in a can, but that’s for another discussion at another time. Anyway, you would stay up all night funneling can after can down your trap. “Mind over Matter” was your mantra. Didn’t matter how horribly bad it tasted. Well, do you know what “Ice” beer is? Ice beer is beer which is  conditioned in a chilled environment, promoting the development of ice crystals which are  removed, thereby concentrating the flavor and alcohol content of the beer. In short, its finding was probably a disgusting mistake. Scrapple surely is superior to Ice beer. 
Scrapple: Undefeated since the beginning of tyyyyyyyyyyme.

I am a man of willpower, sure, but there are some things that I just cannot avoid. One of the delicacies I thoroughly enjoy is scrapple. Sure, some of you health nuts are cringing and looking the other way — I get that, but if you put aside its components and react strictly on taste, I assure you scrapple is unparalleled.

As you learn throughout the course of academic study, one of the essential elements of a well-constructed argument is to acknowledge the opposition’s viewpoint in hopes of strengthening your own. With that said, here goes: Scrapple is virtually the scraps of the other meats in the family.

Now that we’re past that, let’s get turn our attention to the (5) reasons scrapple is awesome, shall we?

Reason 1: Scrapple is always there for you.

- Possibly the best characteristic about breakfast is its ability to be enjoyed any time of the day. Well, scrapple — a predominately breakfast-driven delight — follows the breakfast trend of being able to be enjoyed at any moment of the day. Having a rough morning? Have a scrapple sandwich. Tough day at work? Enjoy some scrapple and eggs for a lunchtime treat. Need to blow some steam after a tough commute home? Cut a couple slices of scrapple off the block and get grubbing!

Reason 2: Scrapple is the perfect change-up.

- At most breakfast chains, you’re given the choice of ham, bacon, or sausage. Don’t misunderstand me, there is nothing wrong with any one of these choices, but one can get burned out eating the same old breakfast meats. Scrapple fills that breakfast void in terms of variety.

Reason 3: Scrapple is a regional juggernaut.

- Most people in the Northeast and out West ain’t got a clue about this stuff because us Philly folk know how to keep a good thing local. Think about it: Go to the South and order a “Steak and Cheese,” I assure you it ain’t what you had in mind — it just isn’t the same. In the Mid-Atlantic, however, scrapple known and respected, and often mistreated, too, by the haters of society.

Reason 4: Harry Kalas ate scrapple.

- C’mon, Phillies fans — I shouldn’t have to type another damn word.

Reason 5: Scrapple is superior to “Ice” beer.

- If you want to talk logistics, then, sure, let’s do it! You beer drinkers of the world — this is directed to you. I am willing to say that in high school or college you drank Natural Ice. First off, that stuff is a hangover in a can, but that’s for another discussion at another time. Anyway, you would stay up all night funneling can after can down your trap. “Mind over Matter” was your mantra. Didn’t matter how horribly bad it tasted. Well, do you know what “Ice” beer is? Ice beer is beer which is conditioned in a chilled environment, promoting the development of ice crystals which are removed, thereby concentrating the flavor and alcohol content of the beer. In short, its finding was probably a disgusting mistake. Scrapple surely is superior to Ice beer.

Scrapple: Undefeated since the beginning of tyyyyyyyyyyme.

Dec9

“Ken Shamrock”

Yesterday, I received a phone call from an old friend of mine. This friend is a graduate student at another institution; he is a mild-mannered individual who is driven to succeed in every aspect of his life. At any rate, this phone call did not come as a surprise; however, the subject matter, on the other hand, was something that no one could have expected.

So, my friend, “Ken Shamrock,” called with a story to tell. This story, he claimed, was one that I would “thoroughly enjoy,” as well as something that even someone of his imagination could not make up. As a good friend does, I obliged to hear this momentous story — my anticipation rising with each passing second.

Without hesitation, Ken delved into his recollection of Monday evening. He told me about how him and a couple of friends from their grad program go out for a drink or two after class on Monday nights. This past Monday, however, was a little different. Ken mentioned a 30-year-old friend of his in the program, Jim, who enjoys the prospect of hooking up with a younger woman. As the 1-2 drinks snowballed into 4-5, Jim asked Ken if he would play “wingman” for him, as he approached two females on the opposite end of the bar. Ken agreed, and the two strategically made their way over to the ladies.

As Jim made conversation with his prey, Ken studied her friend. The girl was a nice looking 21-year old. Her features were decent, and they were complimented nicely with her choice of clothing: jeans, uggs, and a conservative-looking sweater. Nothing too fancy, really. As conversation grew deeper with Jim and his companion, Ken kept to his word — conversing with her friend, displaying an apparent genuine interest in this girl.

Now, by this time, 4-5 drinks have turned into drunk. Copiously drinking, Ken and this girl polished off a bottle of vodka and, conveniently, made their way back to her vacant apartment. As Ken recollects, she was undressing far too quickly to comprehend, and her mission was deliberate. Ken turned around and expeditiously followed suit. As he turned back around, Ken was greeted by an unfamiliar being. No, this was still the same girl he left the bar with, but, suddenly, the conservative-looking girl was replaced with what stood before him: a girl with 20 tattoos and 10 piercings. Ken was dumbfounded. “Have I been duped,” he thought.

Regardless of the apparent change in demeanor, Ken proceeded with the unspoken plans. Things were heating up — and fast, too. Both laying naked, she begins to nibble on Ken’s shoulder. Nibbling turned into biting. Pain ensued. Turning to his right to gander at his shoulder, Ken noticed pieces of his flesh removed; Ken noticed blood trickling down his shoulder. The bites were coupled with the lacerations on his back from her nails.

Ken was not part of a sexual endeavor, he was the prey of a tattooed vampire.

“My friends call me ‘The Vampire,’” she said to Ken. “If you can’t handle this, just wait until I get my whips and chains out for the next time you come over.”

The two continued in their quest for mutual satisfaction. Ken endured the pain delivered by this girl for a good chunk of the evening. Finally, though, Ken decided that he had enough of this torment. It was his turn to retaliate. So, then, Ken pulled her hair and gave her a nice choking. Surely, she would understand the message. These acts of retribution, however, went astray. With each pull or choke, this female became more and more intensely physical — she thrived off of the torment; she enjoyed the inflicted pain.

Ken woke up and left the premises of his Monday night commitment. “Taking one for the team” now has a new meaning for Ken. He lived the fantasy of some, the nightmare of others.

“See you Monday night, Ken,” she said as Ken departed. Will he return to the bar next Monday with a new gameplan? Gauze? Brass knuckles? Who knows.

This is for certain, though: Ken tangoed with the tattooed vampire for one evening, and lived to speak of his venture. As for her next victim, we might not be able to offer such luck.

Oct16

Top 10 Music Videos

Top 10 Favorite Music Videos

We all have our favorites. For whatever reason — mostly boredom — I have decided to compile my ten favorite music videos of all time. In descending order. I am probably forgetting some, but here is my list.

10. Foo Fighters — “Learn to Fly”

A pretty funny video. Kind of sums up the 1990s, I guess. Any video that has a guy’s head turn into a cheeseburger has my attention — at least for a little while.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BieVgyrfglQ

9. Vampire Weekend — “A Punk”

Damnit, I feel bad putting this amongst these other classics. This video is so simple, yet so different. It is ever cleaver and catchy, though, that it has managed to sneak its way into the top ten. Good thing the song is only 2:20 because if it was 3:00, I wouldn’t be able to sit through this nonsense.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_XC2mqcMMGQ

8. The Vapors — “Turning Japanese”

C’mon, man. This 1980 song is creepy, sure, but the video is kind of comical. Here is a guy who is a stalker and a creeper and this girl’s picture makes him “turn Japanese.” Don’t make me explain what that means, I’m sure you can figure it out.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEmJ-VWPDM4

7. Korn — “Freak on a Leash”

I know this one will be unpopular because many of you probably don’t dig Korn. Well, I get that. The video — as many of Korn’s — has a lot of energy and the bullet smashing everything is pretty cool, you have to admit that.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fY_yjPvHQwY

6. Traveling Wilburys — “End of the Line”

First off, the Traveling Wilburys are awesome. It’s very hard to find a group that can rival the talent and accolades of these guys. At any rate, this video is on-point. The group looks like wonders traveling down the railway. Gotta love the rocking chair of then-deceased Roy Orbison. Great song, great video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wucf1QN03mo

5. Jordin Sparks feat. Chris Brown — “No Air”

Anyone that knows me, knows this is one of my jams. Alright, you caught me — I pretty much picked this because of the song and not necessarily the video. Oh well, it’s my list and I can do as I wish.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Icv6DgZ-9O4

4. Wyclef Jean — “Perfect Gentleman”

This song is one of my all-time favorites. When they’re in the academic attire ready for a graduation ceremony and break out, it gets me every time. Leave it up to Wyclef to stand up for strippers. I like that. I can’t believe that this song and video has been around for almost ten years. The fact that I got on stage and did this song at karaoke in the Pocono Mountains is also a good enough reason to have this on here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZqlfOXynuAk

3. Barenaked Ladies — “Brian Wilson”

Another one of my all-time favorites. This video has people doing anything, which, of course, is something I enjoy. A lot of energy in this music video and I like when everyone is frozen and upon Steven Paige’s return to the ground, they’re all back. Always thought this song was interesting, especially considering it all being factually based off of the life of the Beach Boy’s singer, Brian Wilson.

http://www.vh1.com/video/play.jhtml?artist=2432&vid=46271

2. Red Hot Chili Peppers — “Otherside”

This video is wild. To me, it encapsulates the creativeness of the Peppers and leaves you wanting to know exactly what is happening. Down it up, up is down — christ, I feel like Jack Sparrow in the third Pirates of the Caribbean. Anyway, hands down the best music video. GREAT album. GREAT song.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JDstAVqNz8

1. The Grateful Dead — “Touch of Grey”

This is awesome. The Dead is actually dead for half of the video. You got the drummer — skeleton and all — banging away w/ a lit cigarette hanging out. People going wild in the crowd, Converse All-Stars, skeletons, great lyrics — all the making of the #1 video.

http://www.vh1.com/video/play.jhtml?artist=1080&vid=54922

Oct16
johnmichel:

willdo:
“Responsible for at least 50% of anger” is so true. (via megmess)

johnmichel:

willdo:

“Responsible for at least 50% of anger” is so true. (via megmess)
Oct2

Song Lyrics of the Week (10/4-10/10)

Artist: Vanessa Williams; Song: Oh How the Years Go By

In our time of trouble
We only had ourselves
Nobody else
No one was there to save us
We had to save ourselves

And when the storms came through
They found me and you
Back together
And when the sun would shine
It was yours and mine
Yours and mine forever

[Chorus]
Oh, how the years go by
Oh, how the love brings tears to my eyes
All through the changes, the soul never dies
We fight, we laugh, we cry
As the years go by

There were times we stumbled
They thought they had us down
We came around
How we rolled and rambled
We got lost and we got found
Now were back on solid ground

We took everything
All our times would bring
In this world of danger
cause when your heart is strong
You know youre not alone
In this world of strangers

Chorus

If we lose our way
Any night or day
Well, well always be
Im there for you
And I know youre there for me

As the years go by
You know youre not alone
In this world of strangers

Chorus 2x

Oct2
John Stevens (Coach of the Philadelphia Flyers)
We’ve got characters and we’ve got character.
Sep29

Song Lyrics of the Week (9/27-10/03)

Artist: Santana Feat. Citizen Cope; Song: Sideways

You know it ain’t easy
For these thoughts here to leave me
No words to describe it
In French or in English
‘Cause diamonds they fade
And Flowers they bloom
And I’m tellin’ you

These feelings won’t go away
They’ve been knockin’ me sideways
They’ve been knockin’ me out lately
Whenever you come around me
These feelings won’t go away
They’ve been knockin’ me sideways
I keep thinkin’ in a moment that
Time will take them away
These feelings won’t go away

These feelings won’t go away

It ain’t easy
For these thoughts here to leave me
There are no words to describe it
In French or in English
‘Cause diamonds they fade (diamonds they fade)
And flowers they bloom (flowers they bloom)
And I’m tellin’ you

These feelings won’t go away
They’ve been knockin’ me sideways
They’ve been knockin’ me out lately
Whenever you come around me
These feelings won’t go away
They’ve been knockin’ me sideways
I keep thinkin’ that in a moment that
Time will take them away
These feelings won’t go away

Sep24

Batter Up!: Michael’s World of Justification

When prompted to explain why you know something to be true, you can simply assert the response, “because I know.” While this might serve as adequate justification to some, others — especially philosophers or those with a philosophical framework — believe this response to be inadequate or unjustified. When discussion justification, we are given a formula, of sorts, that sump up what we actually claim to know: True Belief + Justification = Knowledge. From there, justification is broken down into two main sections: internalism (prospective and access) and externalism, each of which has its own dimensions and take on how to determine what is truly justified.

Prospective Internalism can be described as follows: a belief is justified because a person can believe other justified beliefs that provide adequate support for it. When discussing what justifies the belief: “There is a table,” a person can justifiably believe that supporting beliefs provide adequate support to reasonably assert that the person is looking at a table. Philosopher William P. Alston offers up a take on internalism:

“There is the idea that in order to confer justification something must be within the subject’s ‘perspective’ or ‘viewpoint’ on the world, in the sense of being something that the subject knows, believes, or justifiably believes. It must be something that falls within the subject’s ken, something of which the subject has taken note. Second, there is the idea that in order to confer justification, something must be accessible to the subject in some special way, for example, directly accessible or infallibly inaccessible.”

The other sect of internalism is known as Access Internalism. Using the “there is a table” example, access internalism can be described as the belief that “there is a table” is justified because the person is aware — or able to be aware — of what makes the belief justified and why.

Again, using the table example — for the last time, I promise — an externalist would argue that the belief that “there is a table” is justified because it is the product of a reliable belief-forming process. With that, whether or not the person who sees the table is aware that the process is reliable, is irrelevant.

Using these different means of epistemic justification, I wish to discuss justification as it relates to the game of baseball — ultimately proving that externalism is the most logical and efficient means of justification.

Baseball, as we know, is referred to as “America’s Pastime.” Dating back to the 1800s, greats like Babe Ruth, Willie Mays, Jackie Robinson, and Cy Young have graced the game with their overwhelming talent and drive to succeed. Though we now have computer imaging and instant replay, for well over 98% of baseball’s existence, most of the calls made in baseball were at the discretion of the umpire. Umpires, like us, are, in fact, human. With that said, this means that it is possible for an umpire, or set of umpires, to make a mistake. Some of the lasting images in baseball history come at the fault of an umpire to make the “correct call.” Since, of course, not all of us see things the same (an argument of perception — a fun one, overlapping one), it is reasonable to assume that what an umpire sees could, in fact, differ from what we see. Furthermore, I will examine this through the identification of what is a “ball” versus a “strike,” fair versus “foul,” and “safe” versus “out.

Though there is some debate about the accuracy, according to the Baseball Almanac, the fastest recorded pitch in baseball history is 104.8 miles-per-hour, thrown by Joel Zumaya on October 10, 2006. Imagine how hard it must be to track that fastball. Most laymen can imagine what a 100 mph car would look like driving down the road. Cars are far larger objects than a baseball, therefore making it much easier to track from point A to point B. As you can imagine, trying to bat against a pitcher whose top speed is above 100 mph is difficult. The circumference of a baseball is between 9-91/4”, allowing the pitcher to have an advantage with the speed of the pitch versus the muscle memory and the eye of the hitter. This is omitting the distance between the pitcher’s mound and home plate, of course.

Balls vs. Strikes

That aside, the umpire must be able to locate the spot of the pitch into what is known as the “strike zone.” As defined by the official rules of Major League Baseball, the strike zone is, “that area over home plate, the upper limit of which is a horizontal line at the midpoint between the top and the shoulders and the tip of the uniform pants, and the lower level is a line at the hollow beneath the knee cap. The Strike Zone shall be determined from the batter’s stance as the batter is prepared to swing at a pitched ball.” This zone is to be governed solely by the eye of the umpire. Over the course of the game, there are many calls that are deemed “questionable” by the umpire what addressing what is a “ball” and what is a “strike.”

Let’s say we’re at a ballgame and the home team is at the bat. The visiting team’s pitcher winds up and throws a ball over the plate. The resulting call is made by the umpire as a “strike,” much to the disagreement of the fans in attendance. The fans yell are roar, stomp their feet, and call the umpire insulting names. Could he have been wrong? Well, possibly, but let’s examine: The ball was released by the pitcher in an overhead motion; the ball projected towards the plate; the batter stood virtually motionless as the ball moved in the direction of the plate; the batter opted not to swing at the pitch; the ball crossed the parameters of the plate, entering the glove of the catcher. This is the course of action for the pitch. As the umpire sees this, he makes the decision to call this pitch a strike — justifying what he saw just moments before as it relates to his perception of the strike zone.

An internalist — more specifically, a prospective internalist — would argue that the umpire ruled the pitch a strike because he know that the pitch was within the zone that is considered a strike, as well as was certain that he had called that pitch a strike before, so that must make the whole situation he just observed a strike, too. An access internalist would possibly add that the umpire knew the ball was a strike because the umpire has been umpiring games for 20 years and is certain that hte pitch was a strike; furthermore, that at the spot of impact where the ball met the glove was in the strike zone, so, by definition, made the pitch a strike.

An externalist could argue this situation by saying that the umpire’s ruling of the pitch being a strike is justified because the umpire saw an object resembling a ball cross the plate within the appropriate height and width of the strike zone, and because all balls that cross the plate within the strike zone should be ruled a strike, he ruled the pitch a strike. In doing so, the umpire’s belief is related to the information and grounds on which the information exists — which is a practical means of determining what is justified.

Fair vs. Foul

Another aspect of baseball that is left up for debate is the determining of whether a ball is hit fair (in play) or foul (out of play). When the ball is hit out of play, the play is dead, unless, of course, the ball is struck in the air, in which case the fielding team can attempt to catch the ball. If a ball is struck in the field of play, the defense has an opportunity to catch the ball or stop the ball and throw it to the appropriate base to attempt to thwart the base runner from advancing or make a play to get the runner out.

At any rate, when the ball is struck, it is up to the umpire and his crew to determine whether or not the ball is in the field of play. The field is designated by chalk lines that are drawn from home plate to the foul poles, located in the outfield. These situations can come at a great cost for a team. A break for the team at the plate could prove to be a jump-start to a productive inning; however, the wrong call can be astronomical for the fielding team — especially if there are runners on base at the time of the at-bat in question.

The umpire can rule that the ball was struck past the base in the baseline and landed on the line or in play. Conversely, the umpire can also rule that the ball landed outside the field of play. Now, a ball is struck in the air and bends towards the foul pole, landing in the stands. The umpire, who has removed his mask and trotted down the line, rules the ball “foul.”

Given this example, a prospective internalist would claim that the umpire saw the ball cross the foul pole before it landed in the seats based off of the fact that no ball that is hit fair could possibly end up in the spot that it landed. Similarly, an access internalist would say that the umpire ruled the ball foul because the umpire is usre that he knows what determined a ball to be fair or foul and that the ball crossed into the territory that makes a ball foul, so, therefore, there is certainty that the ball should be rules foul — keeping the belief held apart from the justification.

An externalist can look at this scenario and determine that the umpire ruled the ball foul because the umpire used a belief-forming process to determine that the ball was foul. For example, the ball must have been foul because the trajectory of the ball — after leaving the bat — allowed for the ball to cross before the pole and into foul territory. Knowing the field of play, and that the ball landed outside of it, the ball couldn’t have landed anywhere else but in foul territory.

Safe vs. Out

Lastly, an umpire must rule whether a base runner is safe or out at any of the four bases. This can be a difficult task for an umpire — especially if they are not in the most opportunistic position to make the correct call. If the runner reaches the bag before the tag is applied by the fielder with the ball, then the runner should be ruled safe. Like the other two examples, though, an umpire can make what we perceive to be the wrong call. This is directly related to what the umpire perceives. Here’s the scenario: there is a play at home plate where the runner slides feet-first, almost simultaneously as the catcher applies the tag. The crowd is a ball of emotion as they anxiously await the umpire’s call. Alas, the umpire throws his right first forward — as if he were shadow boxing — to signal the runner “out” at home plate.

Here, a prospective internalist would argue that the umpire ruled the runner out because the ball beat the runner to the plate and that the catcher appeared to tag the runner before the runner’s foot touched the plate. An access internalist would say that what the umpire thought he saw was the glove touch the runner prior to the runner hitting the plate, and since he knows that if A happens before B, then C, the ruling would be justified.

An externalist’s point-of-view would differ. An externalist would say that the umpire knows what separates “safe” from “out.” An externalist would also say that the umpire knows that the catcher must receive the ball and apply the tag before the runner touches the plate in order to be called “out.” So, in essence, because the umpire knows what constitutes being “safe” and “out,” he made the correct call based off what he thought he saw during the play.

Conclusion

These three examples are aimed to show how different means of justification can view the same situation. While all three viewpoints serve their purpose and are practical, to a degree, externalism is, in fact, the most logical means of justification, especially as described though these examples. Alvin Goldman is an example of a philosopher who embraces the ideas of externalism. Goldman feels as though some internalist explanations fail to consider causation of beliefs; or, rather, to say that they fail to recognize why beliefs come to be formed and held. Goldman focuses on the reliability of belief-formation, or the tendency of a process to produce true beliefs. To Goldman, access internalism is simply not enough.

I understand the use of internalism when discussing justification, however I argue that it is incomplete. Access internalism, for example, holds beliefs apart from justification, which, to me, is nonsensical. Carl Ginet, an internalist, has a discussion of a disinterested justification:

“It is not the fact that there is smoke rising from the forest that justifies S in being confident that there is fire in the forest but rather such facts as that S is confident that he sees smoke, S has no reason to mistrust his sight on this particular matter at this particular time, and S seems to remember that he has come to know that virtually always when there is smoke of the sort he sees that there is fire.”

This idea makes sense. Here, Ginet is saying that it is not the fact that we know that 3+3=9 that justifies a person to be confident in knowing this, rather that the person confidently remembers that he learned that 3+3=9 is more important.

I can see why this form of internalism would serve in some capacity, but I respectfully disagree that internalism, even in this form, is as efficient as externalism. Yes, externalism is loose in some regards, but I feel that is the form that best fits epistemic justification.

[First drafted on 05/06/09]

Sep24

Reflection #1: Graduation

I never anticipated walking in my college graduation. To me, it was something that was more for those in attendance rather than a celebration for those who met their challenges head-on. I thought that walking in graduation was taboo; I thought that walking was something done solely for photo opportunities — not to rejoice and reflect on the hard work and effort that culminated in your certified, signed expensive piece of paper: a diploma.

No, never in a million years did I think I would attend such an event. To me, it was a hallmark occasion — much like Valentine’s Day (if you know me well, you understand my sentiments on that “holiday”). Then again, if you had asked me six or seven years ago, I wasn’t even sure if college was the right move for me — wasn’t sure if it was in my future.

It was Fall 2002 — the time of year where leaves fall from trees just as often intelligent youths fall to the wayside, never utilizing the gifts they are given. Fall 2002 was a special time in my life, it was when Henderson made a run at the AAA State Championship. I’m not writing this to reflect on my soccer days, though; rather, it was an important conversation, that Fall, that really changed my perspective on life.

We were waiting for our team bus to head to Owen J. Roberts to play Strath Haven — the defending State Champions — for the second time in a week. For whatever reason, the bus was late. Little did I know, though, that the lack of punctuality by our bus that day would lead to such a promising future. My best friend, Chuck Walter, was a goalkeeper on our team. To me, he should have been a starter that year, but that’s a debate for another time. At any rate, his father, Mr. Walter, was a constant at our games. Knowing the Walter family in the capacity that I did, Mr. Walter and I would commonly converse prior to or, sometimes, after games. Mr. Walter was at Henderson before the game, talking with some of us as we waited for the bus. On this day, though, our conversation was not about soccer or sports, rather it was about something more important — something that I, to be honest, did not put much thought into before that day: my future.

Mr. Walter pulled me aside that day and asked me about life. He asked me where I expected to be in five years; he asked me what thoughts I have put towards my life after graduation; he asked me what I wanted to get out of life. While these questions seemed quizzical to me at the time, I could certainly flesh out the value in each one. For the first time in my life, someone other than my parents really believed in me — someone cared enough to want to see me succeed. Mr. Walter asked me to keep my “doors” open. He urged me to remember that “small doors can lead to bigger rooms,” and that I don’t want to limit or, worse, squander opportunities at such a young age. I was moved by this. To date, I regard that conversation is one of the most important ones of my life.

You see, in 2002 I was stupid. No, not in a literal sense, silly people. I was a good student, but, rather, my efforts lacked purpose. I had no direction. Because athletics were such a big part of my life, I always consumed myself with the idea of being an athlete my whole life. Never — not one time — did I stop to think what would happen if athletics ended; never did I think about, god forbid, getting injured.

My grandfather used to always tell me, “work with your head, not with your hands.” This is a lasting, and interesting quotation. My grandfather was an operating engineer, my other grandfather was a District Manager for Acme Markets; my mother and father never attended college, so the idea of higher education was, to be honest, foreign to me. I come from a family of blue-collar workers.

Well, I chose to enroll at La Salle University — a private, Catholic institution located in Philadelphia, Pa. I worked hard and earned a degree in English. With a few months to go in my final semester, my parents asked me if I wanted to walk in graduation. For years I expressed my distaste for that ceremony, and, finally, my parents conceded — allowing me to do as I wish. On that particular day, though, I was changed: I finally understood what that day meant. No, in a sense, I was right: it was for the people in attendance; consequently, I was blinded by my own blanket of self-absorption, forgetting to see just how important that day was to everyone around me. I told them I would walk, asking them to invite my grandmother and anyone else who cared to attend. I said to tell them that it’s more than okay not to come, but, if you’re free and would like to see me walk, you’re more than invited.

Then it came: the big day.

I felt normal that morning, unfazed and unwilling to admit that I was probably a little nervous. I showered, had some orange juice, and motioned to the front door of my apartment for the last time as an undergraduate. Before I left, though, I had to thank someone: my grandfather.

Joseph A. Marmer, my grandfather, passed away on September 4, 2006. My grandfather meant the world to me. He passed from cirrhosis of the liver after years and years of hard drinking. “Work with my head and not with my hands,” and, on this day, I was living the endeavor he wished for me long before — I, his grandson, would proudly accept due compensation for my intellectual efforts. I approached my wall where his mass card lays, taped to my wall. I smiled at him. “I did it, Pop,” I said. It was then that I kissed my hand and touched the card. My journey was just beginning.

Dressed in my newly purchased academic attire, I departed for La Salle University one last time. I parked on Belfield, just below 20th Street’s long, treacherous hill. This had been the place I parked all year. I am a man of habit, so this felt like the appropriate place to leave my car. Before shutting the door on my jeep, I opened my glove box, taking out the mass card of my aunt, Deborah Thomas, who passed just months before. Aunt Debbie worked at the Acme across the street from where I lived, so, as you can imagine, we became close. It really hurt when I learned of her sudden passing. It really hurt. With the mass card, I looked at it and smiled. “We’re graduating today, Aunt Debbie. You and I,” I said. With her in hand, I walked up the hill.

This hill brought forth a lot of burrowed emotion. With each step, I thought back to moments past. I thought about how many times I had to run up this hill for track practice; I thought about my first day of school as a Freshman. My mom called me at 7:00am to make sure I was up for class; I thought about how after today things would be different for me, I would never see most of these people again; I thought about my ex-girlfriend, remembering how we met at a mutual friend’s room just three years before; I thought about all my favorite professors and classes; I thought about all the parties and good times I had; I thought about the dumb kid I saw sticking a doughnut in a toaster oven just a year before; I thought about how I thought this day would never come.

Then it was here: the moment.

We stood up and processed towards the stage. Me and my friend and teammate, Dave Alfano, were joking just moments before, but now it was our turn. People would smile and wave when they had their moment, but not me — my moment was far too important.

I remember looking up in the stands and seeing my well-dressed brother (with his hat on, of course) and my two beautiful younger sisters, both taking pictures and smiling as if this moment was theirs. I remember seeing my mother, my proud mother looking on happily. I saw my grandmother and great aunt in the stands, both proud as can be, for in just moments, I would become the first George ever to graduate college. Then, I turned towards the stage — overwhelmed with emotion — and saw my father just to the side. It was then that I truly knew this day meant much more.

With tears in his eyes, I saw my father, with his left fist over his heart, point at me, giving me a thumbs up. I almost crumbled. He mouthed to me, “we did it, son. we did it.” He was right. In mere moments I was graduating for all of us. For my mother, for my father, for Pop, for Nana, for Aunt Debbie, for my Pop-Pop George — for everyone. To think, just weeks before, I was so ignorant to this form of ceremony, I denounced such an occasion. To see my father’s face that day, to see the emotion shared by my family, to see the happiness in their eyes, was the happiest and most alive I have ever felt. All the big goals I’ve ever scored, all the home runs I’ve ever hit, all the big races I’ve ever won, all the trophies I’ve ever earned, seemed meaningless at that moment. They were dwarfed by the ten seconds I was about to endure.

Then, they called my name. I proudly walked towards the president, wearing the pride of my family and the scars of struggle I have endured. I took one look down at my Aunt Debbie’s mass card and kissed her. “We’re graduating now, Aunt Debbie,” I said. “I’m so glad to have you with me.”

I shook the president’s hand and exited the stage. It was official. Over. Done. I have fulfilled my obligations as a student to La Salle University. I left the stage and took one more look over towards my father. I remember him saying that he will be talking to his father the whole time I am up there. “The George’s aren’t dummies,” he would say. He often told me how proud my grandfather would be. He passed away three years before I was born, so, unfortunately, I didn’t have the luxury of meeting him. Trying to hold back his emotion my father smiled and said, “I’m so proud of you.” Those words, Dad, will stay with me forever.

My parents have given me every chance to succeed in every endeavor I have chosen to explore. I am truly blessed to have such parents who believe in me. I must say, if Mr. Walter never talked to me that day, in Fall 2002, my life could be drastically different. To him, I owe my everlasting thanks. He found a good kid that day and saw something in me. I am flattered that he thought enough of me to try to get me to see the bigger picture.

I sit here, today, and write this while holding back emotion. While joyful, some of my past isn’t quite as fond. Nevertheless, I write this as a graduate student at Towson University. Next spring, I anticipate graduating with my Master’s Degree in “Professional Writing.” Who knew I would come so far.

If you’ve made it this far, I commend you. To be honest, I don’t value my life to be that interesting. Throughout the course of my life, I have been criticized for keeping to myself, or not sharing enough of my personal feelings. This wasn’t an easy thing for me to write, to admit to these feelings; to share a focal point in my 23 years of existence. But, for one day, I will let my guard down. If you made it to the end, thank you for sharing the best moment of my life. To see the true emotion in my family awakened me from the emotional slumber that has bogged me down for many years. My brother, Scott, graduated from Williamson Trade School with a degree in Power Plant Technology; my sister, Victoria, a graduate of NMTI with a certification in Massage Therapy; my youngest sister, Sarah, is a Sophomore at Alvernia University; so, Dad, you were right. Tell Pop-Pop that “The George’s aren’t dummies.”

I couldn’t be prouder.

Sep24

Song Lyrics of the Week (9/20-9/26)

Artist: Foo Fighters; Song: Learn To Fly

Run and tell all of the angels
This could take all night
Think I need a devil to help me
Get things right

Hook me up a new revolution
Cos this one is a lie
We sat around laughing
And watch the last one die

[Chorus]
Im looking to the sky to save me
Looking for a sign of life
Looking for something help me burn out bright

Im looking for complications
Looking cos Im tired of lying (trying in 2nd chorus)
Make my way back home
When I learn to fly (high)

Verse 2
Think Im done nursing the patience
I can wait one night
Id give it all away
If you give me one last try

We live happily ever trapped
If you just save my life
Run and tell the angels
That everything is all right

Chorus

Bridge
Fly along with me
I cant quite make it alone
Try to make this life my own
(x2)